Asean Collectivism In Adressing China's Dominance Politics In The South China Sea Conflict: Indonesia’s Perspective

Faidatul Hikmah

doi:10.33019/jph.v4i1.275

Authors

Faidatul Hikmah Magister Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33019/jph.v4i1.275

Keywords:

ASEAN Collectivism, Code of Conduct, Conflict Resolution, Nine-Dash Line, South China Sea, North Natuna Sea

Abstract

This study examines the complexities of the South China Sea (SCS) conflict, focusing on Indonesia’s strategic approach to the Nine-Dash Line (NDL) dispute through ASEAN collectivism. Given Indonesia’s geopolitical and economic stakes, this research explores diplomatic strategies that align with national interests and regional stability. A key challenge is the fragmented stance among ASEAN members, weakening collective diplomatic efforts. This study proposes a unified ASEAN strategy emphasizing collective bargaining, institutional cohesion, and maritime security cooperation. This research employs a juridical-normative method with a descriptive-analytical approach, drawing on secondary materials—including international legal instruments, peer-reviewed journals, diplomatic documents, and authoritative policy analyses—to assess the alignment between das sollen (legal norms) and das sein (state practice) in ASEAN’s conflict-resolution mechanisms. The findings indicate that Indonesia plays a proactive role in strengthening ASEAN’s strategic autonomy and expediting the Code of Conduct (CoC) negotiations with China to secure North Natuna’s sovereignty, economic stability, and security interests. The research concludes that fostering ASEAN collectivism through joint diplomatic and maritime security initiatives is crucial for establishing a rules-based order in the SCS. A coherent ASEAN position in CoC negotiations would deter unilateral actions, ensuring regional stability and safeguarding Indonesia’s long-term national interests

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ako, Rhuks, and Damiola S. Olawuyi. ‘Methodology, Theoretical Framework and Scholarly Significance: An Overview of International Best Practices in Legal Research’. Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy (The) 8, no. 2 (1 January 1970): 225–41. https://doi.org/10.4314/jsdlp.v8i2.11.

Amer, Ramses. ‘China, Vietnam, and the South China Sea: Disputes and Dispute Management’. Ocean Development & International Law 45, no. 1 (2014): 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2013.839160.

Andrias Darmayadi, Andrias Darmayadi, Ervina Nabilah Purnamasari, and Ervina Nabilah Purnamasari. ‘The Indonesia – China Relations in the Natuna Sea Dispute Resolution: Struggle for Sovereignty’. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research 9, no. 1 (4 February 2022): 41–48. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v9i1.870.

Bama Andika Putra. ‘The Rise of Paragunboat Diplomacy as a Maritime Diplomatic Instrument: Indonesia’s Constabulary Forces and Tensions in the North Natuna Seas’. Asian Journal of Political Science 31, no. 2 (4 May 2023): 106–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2023.2226879.

Benyamin, Jefferson, and Hikmat Zakky Almubaroq. ‘The Dynamics of The China Maritime Militia Conflict In South China Sea On Sovereignty Indonesian Countries And ASEAN Region Countries’. JESS (Journal of Education on Social Science) 5, no. 2 (31 January 2022): 185. https://doi.org/10.24036/jess.v5i2.385.

Binsar Simorangkir, Tri Legionosuko, and Surryanto Djoko Waluyo. ‘Improvement Efforts Of Indonesia’s Defense Diplomacy Performance Via Deterrence Strategy In Dealing North Natuna Sea Conflict (2016-2021)’. International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) 2, no. 6 (15 June 2023). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v2i6.519.

De Castro, Renato Cruz. ‘The Limits of Intergovernmentalism: The Philippines’ Changing Strategy in the South China Sea Dispute and Its Impact on the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)’. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 39, no. 3 (December 2020): 335–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103420935562.

Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku and Muhammad Adam Firdaus. ‘INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE ROLE OF THE STATE OF INDONESIA IN ASEAN AS A CONFLICT MEDIUM ON SOUTH CHINA SEA ISSUES’. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) 8, no. 1 (24 October 2022): 453–68. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v8i1.47022.

Dipua, Angkasa, Nuddin Harahap, Dhiana Puspitawati, Faishal Aminuddin, and Lukman Yudho Prakoso. ‘Sea Defense Strategy the Indonesian Navy in Dealing with the South China Sea Conflict’. Italenisch 11, no. 2 (2021). https://italienisch.nl/index.php/VerlagSauerlander/article/view/103.

Farhan Muhammad Aditomo, None Farhan Muhammad Aditomo, Edy Prasetyono, and None Edy Prasetyono. ‘Review of the Formulating of the Code of Conduct in South China Sea between ASEAN and the People’s Republic of China’. Konfrontasi: Jurnal Kultural, Ekonomi Dan Perubahan Sosial 9, no. 1 (31 March 2022): 119–30. https://doi.org/10.33258/konfrontasi2.v9i1.199.

Fernandes, Inggrit, Zainul Daulay, Ferdi Ferdi, and Delfiyanti Delfiyanti. ‘Status of Indonesia’s Sovereign Rights in the North Natuna Sea Conflict Area Consequences of China’s Nine-Dash Line Claim’. Linguistics and Culture Review 5, no. S3 (29 December 2021): 1775–83. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.2051.

———. ‘Status of Indonesia’s Sovereign Rights in the North Natuna Sea Conflict Area Consequences of China’s Nine-Dash Line Claim’. Linguistics and Culture Review 5, no. S3 (29 December 2021): 1775–83. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.2051.

Fong, Yang Lai, Ramachandran Ponnan, and Antoon De Rycker. ‘Different Countries, Different Perspectives: A Comparative Analysis of the South China Sea Disputes Coverage by Malaysian and Chinese Newspapers’. China Report 56, no. 1 (February 2020): 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009445519895627.

Galtung, Johan, and Dietrich Fischer. ‘The Transcend Method in Conflict Mediation Across Levels’. In SpringerBriefs on Pioneers in Science and Practice, Vol. 5, n.d. https://www.springer.com/series/10970.

Hermawan Bangun, Budi. ‘Upaya dan Peran ASEAN dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Laut China Selatan’. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) 7, no. 1 (2 February 2021): 23. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v7i1.31455.

Hoang, Phuong. ‘Domestic Protests and Foreign Policy: An Examination of Anti-China Protests in Vietnam and Vietnamese Policy Towards China Regarding the South China Sea’. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs 6, no. 1 (April 2019): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347797019826747.

Hongbin, Ding, and Ihsan Ullah. ‘THE SOUTH CHINA SEA’S NINE DASH LINE: KEY DISPUTES AND CHINA’S HISTORICAL RIGHTS CLAIMS’. Journal of Pakistan-China Studies (JPCS) 3, no. 1 (1 December 2022): 67–86. https://doi.org/10.55733/jpcs.v3i1.53.

Hu, Le. ‘Examining ASEAN’s Effectiveness in Managing South China Sea Disputes’. The Pacific Review 36, no. 1 (2 January 2023): 119–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2021.1934519.

‘Indonesia Drives Out China Coast Guard Again in Disputed Sea’. Bloomberg, 2025. https://www.energyconnects.com/news/oil/2024/october/indonesia-drives-out-china-coast-guard-again-in-disputed-sea/?.

Kalembang, Joseph Victoryadi, and Yuwanto. ‘Analisis Sangketa Zona Ekonomi Ekslusif Antara Indonesia Dan RRT Di Kepulauan Natuna’. Journal of Politic and Government Studies 9, no. 4 (2020): 1–14.

Kaplan, Robert D. ‘The South China Sea Is The Future of Conflict’. Foreign Policy, no. 188 (October 2011): 2011.

Kipgen, Nehginpao. ‘ASEAN AND CHINA IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA DISPUTES’. Asian Affairs 49, no. 3 (July 2018): 433–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2018.1487691.

Lai, Christina J. ‘Rhetorical Traps and China’s Peaceful Rise: Malaysia and the Philippines in the South China Sea Territorial Disputes’. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 19, no. 1 (2017): 117–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcx008.

Lai, Yew Meng, and Cheng-Chwee Kuik. ‘Structural Sources of Malaysia’s South China Sea Policy: Power Uncertainties and Small-State Hedging’. Australian Journal of International Affairs 75, no. 3 (Des 2020): 277–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2020.1856329.

Lysaght, Padraig. ‘The South China Sea Conflict: Ten Thousand Stones and a Nine-Dash- Line – Rethinking Maritime Space Concepts’. In Unresolved Border, Land, and Maritime Disputes in Southeast Asia, 168–82. 2017. BRILL, 2017.

Manyin, ME, S Dagget, B Dolven, and SV Lawrence. ‘Pivot to the Pacific? The Obama Administration’s" Rebalancing" Toward Asia.’ Library of Congress Wahington DC Congressional Reseacrh Service, 2022. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA584466.

Muhammad Ghaffaar Irsyad Sumarsono. ‘The People’s Republic of China Claims the Nine Dash Line under International Law’. The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education, 2023. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijicle.v5i3.72001.

Mustika Sukma Utari, Firman Hasan, Sri Oktavia, and Ilhamda Fattah Kaloko. ‘China’s Aggressive Stance In The North Natuna Region, Indonesia Did What?’ Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health 2, no. 7 (31 July 2023): 484–96. https://doi.org/10.46799/ajesh.v2i7.83.

Nguyen Tien Vinh, and Nguyen Tien Vinh. ‘The Legal Status of Islands and Other Features and the China’s Unreasonable Claim on the Nine-Dash Line in South China Sea Under the Arbitration Award in the Philippines v. China Case’ 36, no. 1 (27 March 2020). https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1167/vnuls.4251.

Nugraha, Arga. ‘Politik Pembangunan Era Jokowi (Studi: Peran Pemerintah Tiongkok dalam Pembangunan Infrastruktur di Indonesia).’ Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2018.

‘OEC Report’, 2025. https://oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-country/chn/partner/idn?utm_.

Ploberger, Christian. ‘One Belt, One Road – China’s New Grand Strategy’. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies 15, no. 3 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2017.1346922.

Prayuda, Rendi, and Fanesa Angeli. ‘Analisis Implementasi Konsep Coc (Code Of Conduct) Dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Di Laut Natuna UTARA’. Jurnal PIR : Power in International Relations 4, no. 2 (11 December 2020): 137. https://doi.org/10.22303/pir.4.2.2020.137-150.

Putra, Bama Andika. ‘Comprehending Brunei Darussalam’s Vanishing Claims in the South China Sea: China’s Exertion of Economic Power and the Influence of Elite Perception’. Edited by Robert Read. Cogent Social Sciences 7, no. 1 (1 January 2021): 1858563. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1858563.

Putri, Penny Kurnia. ‘Manajemen Konflik dan Resolusi Konflik: Sebuah Pendekatan Terhadap Perdamaian’. Papua Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations 2, no. 1 (30 May 2022): 16–34. https://doi.org/10.31957/pjdir.v2i1.1945.

Radityo, Fransiskus, Gabriella Rara, Indah Amelia, and Rifal Efraim. ‘Geopolitik Tiongkok Di Kawasan Asia Tenggara: Jalur Perdagangan (Obor)’. Jurnal Asia Pacific Studies 3, no. 1 (24 July 2019): 84. https://doi.org/10.33541/japs.v3i1.1073.

Ramadhani, Nurul Fitri. ‘China Enhances Investment Support for Indonesia’s Industrialization’. Xinhua, 2024. https://english.news.cn/asiapacific/20240517/2cc1962382684f16ae09910279b75ebc/c.html?utm_source.

Reed, Lucy, and Kenneth Wong. ‘Marine Entitlements in the South China Sea: The Arbitration Between the Philippines and China’. American Journal of International Law 110, no. 4 (October 2016): 746–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0002930000763202.

Ren, Xiao. ‘China as an Institution-Builder: The Case of the AIIB’. The Pacific Review 29, no. 3 (2016): 435–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2016.1154678.

Reuters. ‘China and Indonesia Sign Multiple Cooperation Deals’. 2025. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/china-indonesia-sign-multiple-cooperation-deals-2024-11-09/?utm_source=.

Reuters. ‘Https://Www.Reuters.Com/Markets/Commodities/Chinese-Firms-Control-around-75-Indonesian-Nickel-Capacity-Report-Finds-2025-02-05/?Utm_source=’. 2025. https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/chinese-firms-control-around-75-indonesian-nickel-capacity-report-finds-2025-02-05/?utm_source=.

Rizani, Naifa. ‘ASEAN Way: Managing Expectation in the Code of Conduct for the South China Sea’. Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional 23, no. 2 (6 December 2021): 218. https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v23i2.666.

Sato, Koichi. ‘The Senkaku Islands Dispute: Four Reasons of the Chinese Offensive - A Japanese View’. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies 8, no. 1 (2 January 2019): 50–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2019.1626567.

Shirley V. Scott, and Shirley V. Scott. ‘China’s Nine-Dash Line, International Law, and the Monroe Doctrine Analogy:’ China Information 30, no. 3 (31 August 2016): 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203x16665054.

Suhanto Suhanto and Angelia Krisdanti Nasera Putri. ‘Indonesia Policy In Resolving The North Natuna Sea Conflict With Tiongkok: A Case Study Of Illegal Fishing In 2019-2020’. Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora 8, no. 1 (12 June 2023): 48–56. https://doi.org/10.47313/pjsh.v8i1.2210.

Yanto, Andri. ‘Resolusi Konflik Zona Ekonomi Ekslusif Indonesia Dan Vietnam Dalam Pengamanan Sumber Daya Maritim Natuna Utara’. Recht Studiosium Law Review 2, no. 1 (2023): 9–18.

Ye, Jian-liang, Xu-wen Qin, Wen-wei Xie, Hai-long Lu, Bao-jin Ma, Hai-jun Qiu, Jin-qiang Liang, et al. ‘The Second Natural Gas Hydrate Production Test in the South China Sea’. China Geology 3, no. 2 (2020): 197–209. https://doi.org/10.31035/cg2020043.

Zhiguo Gao, Zhiguo Gao, Bing Bing Jia, and Bing Bing Jia. ‘The Nine-Dash Line in the South China Sea: History, Status, and Implications’. American Journal of International Law 107, no. 1 (1 January 2013): 98–123. https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.1.0098.