Transformation of Land Rights Evidence in the National Agrarian System After the 2026 Abolition of Customary Documents: A Study of Legal Certainty and Agrarian Principles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33019/jph.v4i1.257Keywords:
customary documents, legal certainty, land rights evidence, agrarian reformAbstract
The abolition of customary documents as evidence of land history in 2026, as regulated in Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021, marks a fundamental shift in the architecture of land rights evidence in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the impact of this policy on the evidentiary system within the framework of national agrarian law, examine its normative and administrative implications for communities previously reliant on customary-based evidence, and assess the extent to which post-2026 evidentiary transformation can realize the principle of legal certainty. Using a normative juridical approach and linking it to agrarian principles, this research examines the structural changes in evidentiary mechanisms following the exclusion of customary documents from land administration processes. The findings show that the abolition has created gaps in initial evidence and procedural irregularities, thereby expanding public uncertainty in demonstrating the origins of land tenure. Furthermore, the disappearance of customary documents weakens the evidentiary position of communities and increases dependence on state administrative verification, particularly regarding access and validity. On the other hand, the transformation of the evidentiary framework has not fully achieved legal certainty due to variations in practice, data fragmentation, and the wide interpretive discretion of officials. These findings underscore the need for measurable transitional evidentiary guidelines, inclusive administrative recognition schemes, and standardized procedures to more effectively achieve the objectives of agrarian reform and legal certainty.
Downloads
References
Ammade, F. R. D., Muslihat, S. N. N., & Kamilia, Z. (2023). Tantangan dan Hambatan dalam Upaya Penegakan Delapan Prinsip Moralitas Hukum Lon L. Fuller di Indonesia. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan, Seni, Sains dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(02). Doi: https://doi.org/10.11111/nusantara.xxxxxxx
Afif, M. (2025, March 17). Menjadi Diri Manusia Yang Autentik, diakses pada https://marinews.mahkamahagung.go.id/putusan/menjadi-diri-manusia-yang-autentik-0dx diakses pada 2 Desember 2025
Hardiantoro, A., & Sartika, R. E. A. (2025, July 2). Girik dan Letter C Tak Berlaku Mulai 2026, Benarkah Tanah Yang Belum Disertifikatkan Menjadi Milik Negara, diakses pada https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2025/07/02/150000065/girik-san-letter-c-tak-berlaku-lagi/mulai-2026-benarkah-tanah-yang-belum?page=all diakses pada 1 Desember 2025
Hanisa, I., Handayani, I. G. K. A. R., & Karjoko, L. (2025). Implikasi Hukum Sengketa Sertifikat Ganda Terhadap Kepastian Hak Atas Tanah dan Asas Kepastian Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains, 4(01), 144-150. Doi: https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v4i01.1844
Harsono, B. Hukum Agraria Indonesia: Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi dan Pelaksanannya, (Jakarta: Djambatan Press, 2003), dikutip dalam Putri, V. M. F., Lengkong, N. L., & Gerungan, L. K. F. R. (2025). Implementasi United Nations Declaration On The Rights Of Indigenous Peoples Dalam Hukum Nasional Untuk Perlindungan Hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat Terhadap Tanah Adat di Indonesia, Lex Crimen: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum, 14(2).
Hidayat, M. J., Saputra, T. Y., & Ardiyansyah, A. (2025). Analisis Hukum Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap di Kabupaten Pidie. MEUSAPAT: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 172-196
Iqbal, F. M. (2025). Legal Analysis of The Protection and Legal Certainty of Electronic Land Certificates as an Instrument of Land Reform in Indonesia. KRTHA BHAYANGKARA, 19(1), 176-187. Doi: https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v19i1.3628
Lubis, I., Siregar, T.., Lubis, D. I. S., Adawiyah, R., & Lubis, A. H. (2025). Integrasi Hukum Adat dalam Sistem Hukum Agraria Nasional Tantangan dan Solusi dalam Pengakuan Hak Ulayat. Tunas Agraria, 8(2), 143-158. Doi: https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v8i2.401
Mahkamah Agung RI. (1960). Putusan No.34 K/Sip/1960 (10 Februari 1960).
Mahkamah Agung RI. (2015). Putusan No. 397 K/TUN/2015.
Mahkamah Agung RI. (2016). Putusan No. 294 PK/Pdt/2016 (26 Juli 2016).
Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. (2012) Ikhtisar Putusan Perkara Nomor 35/PUU-X/2012 tentang Hutan Adat
Marryanti, S., & Nurrokhman, A. (2021). Kepastian Hukum Atas Hak Tanah: Pelajaran dari Kekalahan Perkara Pertanahan di Pengadilan. Jurnal Pertanahan, 11(2). Doi: https://doi.org/10.53686/jp.v11i2.111
Oktaviani, A., & Harjono, S. H. (2019). Kekuatan Pembuktian Surat Letter C dalam Pemeriksaan Sengketa Tanah di Persidangan. Verstek, 7(1). Doi: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v7i1.30038
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2021 tentang Hak Pengelolaan, Hak Atas Tanah, Satuan Rumah Susun, dan Pendaftaran Tanah
Rachmawati, D. (2021). Kepastian Hukum terhadap Tanda Bukti Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah. Syntax Literature: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 6(6). Doi: https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literature.v6i6.3038
Rahmad, A. (2023). Harmonisasi Hukum Adat Hukum Pertanahan Nasional Terkait Kepemilikan Tanah dalam Rangka Proyek Strategis Nasional. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 1(1), 1-12. Doi: https://doi.org/10.61942/jhk.v1i1.43
Rini, A. P., & Winanti, A. (2024). Evidence of Girik Documentation in Land Acquisition Dispues (Study of Tangerang District Court Decision Number 907/Pdt.G/2018/PN Tng). Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(2), 755-765. Doi: https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i2.1051
Rubiati, B. (2024). The Existence and Protection of Ulayat Rights in Indigenous Communities Within the Framework of Positive Law in Indonesia. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjajaran, 5(2), 302-320. Doi: https://doi.org/10.23920/jphp.v5i2.1450
Rosmidah, R., &Pebrianto, D. Y. (2020). Transparency Principle on Land Acquisition for Agraria Justice. Jambe Law Journal, 3(1), 83-1-1. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22437/jlj.3.1.83-101
Sidabutar, B. (2023). Kepastian Hukum Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Menurut Sistem Hukum di Indonesia dan Praktik Yudisial. Jurnal Gagasan Hukum, 5(01). Doi: https://doi.org/10.31849/jgh.v5i01.13232
Sulele, Y., Pongkorung, F., & Goni, C. J. J. G. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis Pendaftaran Hak Atas Tanah Melalui Buku Letter C, Petok D, dan Girik dalam Mencegah Sengketa Tanah Berdasasrkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 18 Tahun 2021. Lex Crimen: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Unsrat, 13(5).
Tejawati, D. (2021). Asas Kepastian Hukum dalam Kedudukan Girik Terhadap Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 3(2). Doi: https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v3n2.p251-273
Tirandika, P. R. A., & Resen, M. G. S. K. (2023). Penerapan Tata Cara Pendaftaran Tanah di Indonesia Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah No.18 Tahun 2021. Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 8(01). Doi: https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2023.v08.i01.p3
Umami, A. M., & Permata, S. N. (2025). Perkembangan pengaturan Tanah Adat di Indonesia. Ganec Swara, 19(1), 371-375. Doi: https://doi.org/10.59896/gara.v19i1.227
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria.
Winata, Meta Nadia (2021). Analisis Terhadap Tanda Bukti Hak Lama Sebagai Petunjuk Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Menurut Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 18 Tahun 2021. Indonesian Notary: Vol. 3. No.3, Article 44. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/notary/vol3/iss3/44
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Silvianti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
