Efektifitas Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Menyelesaikan Putusan Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara

Abstract

The birth of the State Administrative Court is actually to ensure that the conflicting parties in state administrative relations with the general public have a harmonious and respectful relationship. However, in reality, the expectations of the public towards the presence of the State Administrative Court have not been fully realized. Therefore, through this paper the author examines the effectiveness of the State Administrative Court in resolving administrative disputes and seeks efforts that can maximize the effectiveness of the State Administrative Court in resolving state administrative disputes. The writing of this journal uses the juridical-normative method with the theory used is the Theory of Legal Effectiveness. Based on the results of the analysis, it is concluded that the dispute process at the State Administrative Court has not been fully effective. This is due to several factors, including the absence of laws and regulations that are more explicit in regulating the execution of State Administrative Court Decisions, the absence of a special institution in the State Administrative Court in charge of overseeing the execution of State Administrative Court Decisions, and the poor legal culture of non-compliance by Government Officials in implementing State Administrative Court Decisions as well as the low sanctions given to State Administrative officials who do not implement State Administrative Court decisions.